So why pay more?
Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2025 3:56 am
The channel developed, then the number of subscribers declined, and then there was new development, a sharp increase in subscribers and an almost flat picture of the number of users.
What's the secret? Looking ahead, I'll say: it turned out that these 2 channels were run by the same admin. He came up with a "brilliant" scheme: he would upload bots to the channel, and then turn the views around. And everyone was happy. But when this person was fired and stopped buying bots, the views dropped.
Yes, investing in promotion is much more expensive than buying bots. If promotion costs turkey rcs data about $200-300 per month, depending on the tasks, then bots can be bought for 100-300 hryvnias.
So, why pay more?
But how do you know that a channel is “driving views” if you’re not the one doing it? To do this, you should study Telegram’s internal statistics. It is available for channels with 50,000 or more subscribers. You can access it from your phone right in the channel. Thanks to it, the channel administrator can learn a lot of useful information that no other service will provide.
What's the secret? Looking ahead, I'll say: it turned out that these 2 channels were run by the same admin. He came up with a "brilliant" scheme: he would upload bots to the channel, and then turn the views around. And everyone was happy. But when this person was fired and stopped buying bots, the views dropped.
Yes, investing in promotion is much more expensive than buying bots. If promotion costs turkey rcs data about $200-300 per month, depending on the tasks, then bots can be bought for 100-300 hryvnias.
So, why pay more?
But how do you know that a channel is “driving views” if you’re not the one doing it? To do this, you should study Telegram’s internal statistics. It is available for channels with 50,000 or more subscribers. You can access it from your phone right in the channel. Thanks to it, the channel administrator can learn a lot of useful information that no other service will provide.