These are the factors that domestic SEOs have forgotten how to work with over many years of link ranking dominance. But they can and should be worked with. We have examples when only due to commercial factors and improved usability we achieved good growth in search engines. But for this we need to work with the site. Our SEOs are used to going somewhere, depositing money, buying something somewhere, setting it up once - and that's it, refresh the statistics, wait for the results.
This applies to everything, even texts. to some template. There is a technical task, italy consumer email list there is a description of the number of occurrences of keys. They ordered texts, without thinking at all about what is written there, without reading them, posted them on the site, bought links - and wait for the result. But even now, after this method stopped working, everything can turn towards PF cheating: also put money somewhere, bought users, gave them an algorithm of actions: go to the search results, type in a search query, go to such and such a page, do this and that.
But this has nothing to do with the development of the site. In my opinion, the alternative to this is moving towards improving the site and its user characteristics. I am sure that search engines analyze these things. Another thing is that any thing that is evaluated algorithmically can also be cheated algorithmically. And we have been through this too. Text factors worked - the optimizers' response was "foot wraps".
The market is used to working with texts according
-
sumaiyakhatun27
- Posts: 514
- Joined: Mon Dec 23, 2024 5:30 am