So, what do we see in all these recommendations?

[sumaiyakhatun27]

Sites that are easy to use. Sites that provide users with high-quality and relevant information. Sites that stand out from the competition due to their unique content and approach. Google Punishes: Sites that mislead users. Sites that use tricks to improve their search engine rankings. Sites with automatically generated content . Sites participating in link exchange schemes . Sites that publish low-quality or copied content.


Sites that use too many keywords . And a separate quote from Google, which I ask turkey email list you to pay special attention to (copied word for word from the official webmaster guide): Webmasters who try to follow the fundamental principles in their work make it much easier for users to interact with the system, and therefore their sites are located higher in search results than the sites of those who spend their time looking for loopholes.


Both search engines oppose "black" SEO and any manipulation of search results and encourage high-quality relevant content, good usability and care for users. At the same time, both search engines have special filters and algorithms that actively fight against violators of these rules: "Penguin" and "Minusinsk" punish sites that purchase SEO links. "Panda" and "AGS" are fighting against low-quality content.