Power within companies and organizations is directly related to results

[RafiRiFat336205]

Another critical point is power. Europeans and the whole world could see impassively the collapse of politics and, why not, democracy with the Greek referendum of 2015, which resulted in a resounding rejection of the conditions of the bailout proposed by the monetary bodies (economic power). The Greeks and their politicians had to give in to power, in an exemplary and shameful way for all of us. It is not only about economic power, it is necessary to question power from a philosophical, ethical and constructivist point of view of a better world.

First of all, we must ask: Who is in charge? The answer is obvious: the one who defines the results that must be achieved or the one who defines the organizational goals is in charge. The problem is that the results are not all israel product list normally linked to the values ​​of conduct or moral principles. We can exemplify this with a soccer game where a certain team plays badly, contrary to its opponent, engaging in violent anti-play and its star player simulates a foul inside the opponent's area in the 90th minute, the referee calls a penalty and the same star player scores the winning goal. For the ethics of results, what counts are the points, since they are the indicators of the success or expected result. We perceive that conduct or principles do not matter, surely the star player will be praised and will continue to be idolized. This happens daily in most organizations.

Within this perspective, I think we should reflect on the future we are building, bearing in mind that we all legitimately want to live well. To do this, we should ask ourselves the following questions: What is necessary for life to be good? What is the life worth living? In what world do we want to live?

These are not new questions; these philosophical questions were already being asked more than 350 BC in Greece by Plato and Aristotle and continue to this day.