The next step is obviously for generative AI to produce all or part of the responses to calls for tender. Depending on the judgment criteria indicated in the RC, the framework imposed in the technical response framework (CRT), the services requested in the CCTP, and the notification or rejection reports of previous similar offers, AI tools will undoubtedly be able to generate an ESN's response to a call for tender in the near future. Or, for some companies that are not very careful, to generate truly anonymous CVs that meet the skills criteria defined by public figures.
Robot and computers
The representatives of the contracting authority (RPA) of public consultations will then have to worry sweden telegram data about how the response of an ESN was drafted, with or without the help of AI tools. This could call into question the absolute criterion of equal opportunities for companies in public calls for tender. Would the analysis of a call for tenders therefore consist of judging the relevance of an ESN's AI tools, instead of its real human and methodological skills? Will public bodies also have to equip themselves with tools to detect the rate of AI used by an ESN to formulate a response to a call for tender? Will this practice have to be regulated in a public procurement code adapted to generative artificial intelligence?